The Big "O"

Agent 13 wrote:What about bicycle helmets? I distinctly remember them making promises about universal bicycle helmet use...always...even when walking.

bbqboy wrote:Isn't that already required for this forum?

clothier wrote:mine has a full face mask on it!

The Goddess wrote:
Better than running off to Waco to clear brush, IMHO.

The Goddess wrote:

laststandchili wrote:Hey everybody, Obama's off to Europe to try to get the Olympics for Chicago!!!

We're getting nowhere on health care, troops for Afghanistan, or Iranian nukes, so maybe we can make some headway on the Olympic situation if we can get Oprah on board.

I understand if this new initiative falls through the administration is planning to get to work on some really tough new seatbelt laws.

At least for DC.

Better than running off to Waco to clear brush, IMHO.

Billy Heff wrote:

The Goddess wrote:

laststandchili wrote:Hey everybody, Obama's off to Europe to try to get the Olympics for Chicago!!!

We're getting nowhere on health care, troops for Afghanistan, or Iranian nukes, so maybe we can make some headway on the Olympic situation if we can get Oprah on board.

I understand if this new initiative falls through the administration is planning to get to work on some really tough new seatbelt laws.

At least for DC.

Better than running off to Waco to clear brush, IMHO.

Wasn't that Janet Reno in Waco? Georgie was trimming a Bush in Crawford.

clothier wrote:i can't remember something.

did we actually all agree on the Mel Brooks ban?

bbqboy, i'll explain. some of us find Mr Brooks works incredibly funny ( i think silent movie is one of the greatest feats of movie making ever) while some of us don't find any humor in Mr Brooks ouvre.
it has caused, as i'm sure you can imagine, much of a stir. Kind of like the current billy heff fight, other then the fact that we actually care about the Brooks arguement. Anyway, to avoid further fighting, we just stopped talking about.

So, if someone with a better memory then me would chime in, that would be cool.

bbqboy wrote:

clothier wrote:i can't remember something.

did we actually all agree on the Mel Brooks ban?

bbqboy, i'll explain. some of us find Mr Brooks works incredibly funny ( i think silent movie is one of the greatest feats of movie making ever) while some of us don't find any humor in Mr Brooks ouvre.
it has caused, as i'm sure you can imagine, much of a stir. Kind of like the current billy heff fight, other then the fact that we actually care about the Brooks arguement. Anyway, to avoid further fighting, we just stopped talking about.

So, if someone with a better memory then me would chime in, that would be cool.

If you didn't argue, wouldn't you die? Besides, I don't care about rules.

clothier wrote:i can't remember something.

did we actually all agree on the Mel Brooks ban?

Agent 13 wrote:

bbqboy wrote:

clothier wrote:i can't remember something.

did we actually all agree on the Mel Brooks ban?

bbqboy, i'll explain. some of us find Mr Brooks works incredibly funny ( i think silent movie is one of the greatest feats of movie making ever) while some of us don't find any humor in Mr Brooks ouvre.
it has caused, as i'm sure you can imagine, much of a stir. Kind of like the current billy heff fight, other then the fact that we actually care about the Brooks arguement. Anyway, to avoid further fighting, we just stopped talking about.

So, if someone with a better memory then me would chime in, that would be cool.

If you didn't argue, wouldn't you die? Besides, I don't care about rules.

I hope you at least read the rules...so you know what not to care about.

so in other words, I'm being too nice?
OK.
By the way, I missed the mel brooks missive. Is this a socialist/collective web site where we all get to make decisions?
Sort of like biggest loser?

http://wayofftopic.darkbb.com/rules-f1/rules-of-the-forum-t1.htm